A rider to the Agreement has slightly relaxed this condition and will soon enable engineers and managers classified in position 2.3 to be placed on a fixed-day contract.
However, if you want to place an employee on a fixed day rate, you will need to pay them 120% of the agreed minimum wage for employees in position 3.1, and 122% of the agreed minimum wage for employees in position 2.3.
This represents a gross monthly salary of €3,905.22 for an employee in position 2.3 and €4,292.40 for employees in position 3.1.
As a reminder, the changeover to a fixed-term working week also requires compliance with a number of legal and contractual conditions in order to be valid and avoid the risk of the fixed-term agreement becoming null and void.
Once again, this system is not adapted to the reality of many companies covered by the Syntec agreement.
How can I opt out of the Syntec agreement?
In reality, it appears that these procedures are not suited to most small and medium-sized companies covered by the SYNTEC agreement.
In fact, it presupposes overly drastic conditions that do not correspond to the economic reality of these companies.
Clearly, these companies can’t afford to comply with the terms and conditions proposed by the Syntec Agreement, because they can’t afford to pay their fixed-hour employees a minimum of €43,992 a year, or to apply the various supplements provided for by the branch agreement in these different terms and conditions.
For these companies, it is therefore necessary to derogate from the branch agreement.
This derogation can be achieved through the adoption of various company agreements:
Adopting a company agreement on the organization of working hours
The organization of working hours within companies can be achieved by means of agreements aimed at setting up an organization of working hours over a period longer than a week and at most equal to a year (or even three years, if authorized by a branch agreement or collective bargaining agreement).
This type of agreement makes it possible to adapt employees’ work patterns throughout the year, depending on the company’s activity, and thus avoid overtime during peak periods.
Clearly, a reference period is set, with a limit, above which overtime will be paid to employees.
For example, the limit for one year is set at 1607 hours: if at the end of the year one or more employees have exceeded this limit, they will have to be compensated for the overtime hours worked during the year.
It is also possible to set a weekly limit, e.g. 39 hours, beyond which hours worked during the same week are in any case considered as overtime, and paid with the salary for the month in question.
This arrangement can be put in place through a company agreement, or through a unilateral commitment by the employer.
In companies without employee representatives, adoption of the company-wide agreement will require a company-wide referendum and approval of the project by a 2/3 majority of the workforce.
Please note: if you decide to implement this type of agreement through a unilateral commitment, it can only be organized in work periods, equal to 9 weeks in companies with fewer than 50 employees, and four weeks for companies with 50 or more employees.
A company-wide agreement on the organization of working hours can therefore be an appropriate solution for small and medium-sized businesses wishing to derogate from the provisions of the Syntec Agreement and organize their own working hours.
However, the adoption of such an agreement presupposes either negotiation with employee representatives, or the introduction of a company-wide referendum in companies without such representatives. In the latter case, it will be necessary to obtain the approval of 2/3 of employees.
The introduction of such an arrangement by means of a unilateral commitment is less attractive because of the short period during which the agreement can be put in place.
Setting up an agreement overriding collective bargaining provisions relating to fixed-rate working days
Syntec lays down very strict conditions for setting up a fixed-rate working day agreement with a company’s employees.
Once again, these conditions may prevent smaller companies from implementing this type of agreement, even though they are sometimes more favorable to employees and better suited to the company.
Since September 2017, company agreements have enjoyed real primacy over branch agreements in this area.
It is therefore perfectly possible for your company to conclude an agreement extending the scope of fixed-price agreements.
This agreement may enable you to open up access to fixed-price agreements to employees who are not in position 3.1 or 2.3.
On the other hand, it will not be possible to extend this possibility to employees who are not managers or engineers, as the latter do not have sufficient autonomy to access this type of agreement. This would run the risk of rendering null and void any lump-sum agreements concluded on the basis of such an agreement.
It is also possible to provide for lower remuneration than that stipulated in the Syntec Agreement.
In fact, the only imperative that cannot be derogated from, even by company agreement, are the collective bargaining minimums defined by regularly revised scales.
On the other hand, the arrangements implemented within Syntec, under which an employee in position 3.1 can only be placed under a fixed-term workweek agreement if he or she receives 120% of the agreed minimum, do not constitute an imperative arrangement.
It is perfectly possible to derogate from this rule by means of a company agreement, and to provide for a lesser or different form of compensation.
Once again, this will require the adoption of a company-wide agreement, in line with the above-mentioned conditions.
Why derogate from the Syntec Agreement’s provisions on the organization of working hours?
It would appear that the Syntec collective bargaining agreement’s provisions on the organization of working hours are not adapted to the economic reality of small and medium-sized companies subject to this agreement.
It is therefore necessary for these companies to use company-level negotiations to derogate from branch provisions, within the limits set by law.
These derogations will enable these companies to adapt their working hours to their real needs, and thus support their growth and productivity.
Please note: there is no question of allowing companies to derogate from the branch in their sole interest, without taking into account the interests of employees.
The aim is to enable these companies to adapt working hours to their needs, while taking into account employees’ working conditions and envisaging compensation packages for employees that are simply better adapted to the economic reality of these companies.
Negotiations at company level would thus enable small and medium-sized businesses to set up working time arrangements that are fully adapted to their needs, with compensation packages for their employees that are also adapted to their economic health.